NewsSquawk, January 28, 2008

More news on the Children’s Health bill. Last week there was another vote to try to overrule George Bush’s veto of the proposed Children’s Health bill. The 260 to 152 result was not quite enough for it to pass.

At the moment in the USA there is a kind of no-man’s-land. There are families who cannot afford private health insurance, but do not qualify for Medicaid because they are not poor enough. The program is aimed at these very people.

Bush is vetoing the bill because he believes that it is too close to a “state-run” system similar to Canada and Western Europe. Currently in the US, our government spends 16% of our economy on healthcare, compared to Western Europe who spends about 8%. There are currently 50 million Americans without health insurance, comparatively all persons in Western Europe are covered.

As an American living in Europe, I have a view to both systems and there are pros and cons to each. I can see why the “European” system as it is probably would not work in America. I think what is bugging me here is that if this bill helps improve things in America, so what if it bears a similarity to the European system? It’s not the European system - so what is there to be afraid of if in the end this piece will work for America and it will help millions of children? I would be interested in understanding in a bit more detail why Bush decided to veto it, there surely is a better reason than that. And I am even more interested in hearing what the presidential candidates have to say on the issue.

What would you do? In a sad story (a warning to any weepy preggos out there) at four months pregnant, a woman in the UK found out that she had bowel cancer and she made the difficult decision to delay her cancer treatment until after her child was born. The baby was born at 25 weeks, and she began treatment immediately after the birth yet died two months later.

I would like to say that I would make the same decision, but to be honest I don’t know if I would be strong enough of a person. Her cancer was at an advanced stage, it would have been a difficult battle in any case. A tragic story all around. My condolences go out to her family. (And little baby Liam does look adorable in the last picture at the bottom of the article.)

Is she or isn’t she? After wearing a very flowy gown to yesterday’s SAG awards, the tabloids are yet again abuzz with rumors that Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are expecting their second biological child. Some are even saying that she is pregnant with twins! Keep in mind, it was only a few short months ago that the same rumor was going around about Jennifer Lopez…

3 Responses to “NewsSquawk, January 28, 2008”

  1. Mally Says:

    What a heartbreaking story! I have no words. Life seems so cruel when young people are taken so early. The family will remain in my prayers.

  2. cofourcade Says:

    OMG, what a sad story. This is just heartbreaking… :(

  3. mommasteph Says:

    Re: SCHIP, I think it’s because the new bill would allow some children from families at 300% the poverty level (over $60,000) to be covered. The argument is also that it could lead to families leaving private insurance for SCHIP. So I guess what the president means is he sees it as a definitive step towards socialized medicine.

    As a novice on the topic, I guess I’d like some safeguards - say, if a family makes $60,000, they’d have to prove that health insurance is not offered through their employers (or that the cost is prohibitive, or that someone in their family was rejected for coverage, etc.), and they’d pay a fair amount into the SCHIP plan for their kids’ coverage. I don’t see giving it away as a good idea, except for the working poor.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment